From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairfield v. Ford Motor Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 26, 2013
394 S.W.3d 500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. WD 74887.

2013-03-26

Terry FAIRFIELD, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Second Injury Fund, Respondents.

Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. William C. Spooner, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Bruce Levine, for Respondent Ford Motor Company.


Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
William C. Spooner, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Bruce Levine, for Respondent Ford Motor Company.
Kimberley C. Fournier, for Respondent Second Injury Fund.

Before Division Three: ALOK AHUJA, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Terry Fairfield appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's Award denying workers' compensation benefits for his injury of April 13, 2004. The Commission denied benefits based on its finding that Mr. Fairfield filed his claim for compensation for that injury after the statute of limitations had run. On appeal, Mr. Fairfield claims that the Commission erred in denying benefits because his employer, Ford Motor Company, had made payment on account of the April 13, 2004 injury sufficient to toll the statute of limitations on his claim, rendering his claim timely filed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fairfield v. Ford Motor Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 26, 2013
394 S.W.3d 500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Fairfield v. Ford Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:Terry FAIRFIELD, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Second Injury Fund…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

394 S.W.3d 500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)