Fairfax v. Dep't of the Army

Full title: DUANE FAIRFAX, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

No. 2021-1802 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1802

04-07-2022

DUANE FAIRFAX, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

Daniel Meyer, Matthew F. Mihalich, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Steven C. Hough, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Elizabeth Marie Hosford, Patricia M. McCarthy.

PER CURIAM.

This Disposition is Nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Nos. DC-1221-18-0499-W-3, DC-1221-19-0257-W-2.

Daniel Meyer, Matthew F. Mihalich, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Steven C. Hough, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Elizabeth Marie Hosford, Patricia M. McCarthy.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM.

Newman, Reyna, and Hughes, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.