Summary
affirming on this basis the judgment of a three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County
Summary of this case from Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc.Opinion
No. 84A16.
05-06-2016
Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, by Michael Crowell, Deborah Stagner, Stephen Rawson, and Neal Ramee, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General; Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General; Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General; and Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants. Graebe, Hanna & Sullivan PLLC, Raleigh, by Mark R. Sigmon ; American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, by Christopher Brook, Raleigh and Jenifer Wolfe; and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, by Elliot Engstrom, for American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, amici curiae. John V. Orth, pro se, amicus curiae.
Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, by Michael Crowell, Deborah Stagner, Stephen Rawson, and Neal Ramee, for plaintiff-appellees.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General; Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General; Alexander McC. Peters, Senior Deputy Attorney General; and Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.
Graebe, Hanna & Sullivan PLLC, Raleigh, by Mark R. Sigmon ; American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, by Christopher Brook, Raleigh and Jenifer Wolfe; and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, by Elliot Engstrom, for American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation and Civitas Institute, Center for Law and Freedom, amici curiae.
John V. Orth, pro se, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
Justice EDMUNDS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the judgment of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County. Accordingly, the judgment of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court, Wake County is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5, 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.