From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairchild v. Los Angeles County

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
Civil Action 21cv496-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 21cv496-GPC-KSC

06-09-2021

Alison Helen Fairchild Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles County et al (see attachment for full list) Defendant.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Court accordingly:

1. GRANTS IN PART and DENIES AS MOOT IN PART Defendant Grubhub's request for judicial notice;
2. DISMISSES the case without prejudice;
3. VACATES the hearing on this mat ter; and
4. DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Electronically File Documents and Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No. 15).

(ATTACHMENT)

Los Angeles County

Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Alex Villanueva

Sergeant White

Captain Andy Berg

Lieutenant Doe

Christine Marie Perrette

Nitin Bhanubhai Solanki

Mrs. Solanki

Sobi Investments, LLC

Evergreen Inn Motel

Michael Doe Defendant

Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office

Jane Doe (room 106)

Jane Doe (room 110)

John Doe (room 104)

Jane Doe (room 205A)

Grubhub LLC

Just Eat Takeaway.com n.v doing business in the United States as Grubhub Inc

Does 1-10


Summaries of

Fairchild v. Los Angeles County

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
Civil Action 21cv496-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Fairchild v. Los Angeles County

Case Details

Full title:Alison Helen Fairchild Plaintiff, v. Los Angeles County et al (see…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 21cv496-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)