Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18-CV-00436-RAS
06-17-2019
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14), recommending the above-styled civil action be dismissed with prejudice to the claims being asserted again until such time as Fagans can show that his conviction has been overturned, expunged by executive order, declared invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called into question through the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed Objections (Doc. No. 20) to the Report and Recommendation. Generally speaking, Plaintiff argues that Heck v. Humphrey, 515 U.S. 477 (1994), does not supersede rights granted to Plaintiff under the United States Constitution. (Doc. No. 20.) Plaintiff also rehashes the merits of his claim. (Doc. No. 20.)
The Court conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Magistrate Judge's findings to which objections have been raised and finds that the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions are correct. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 20) and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) as the findings of the Court. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the claims being asserted again until such time as Plaintiff can show that his conviction has been overturned, expunged by executive order, declared invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called into question through the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus.
SIGNED this the 17th day of June, 2019.
/s/_________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE