From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fabiano v. Kirkorian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Summary

denying a defense motion for summary judgment where "the plaintiff, who has a herniated disc, submitted, among other things, an affirmation of his orthopedist which specified the decreased range of motion in his lumbar and cervical spines, and explained that his injuries are permanent and causally related to the motor vehicle accident. The orthopedist's opinion, supported by objective evidence, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact."

Summary of this case from Moscato v. United States

Opinion

2002-04474

Submitted May 21, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated April 16, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Elena Kirkorian for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her and granted that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Kruger Leasing, Inc., and Philip T. Carpenter which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), and denied as academic his cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and, inter alia, to strike the answer of the defendants Kruger Leasing, Inc., and Philip T. Carpenter for their failure to comply with discovery orders.

William Pagan Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Dylan Braverman of counsel), for appellant.

Diamond, Cardo, King, Peters Fodera, New York, N.Y. (Deborah F. Peters of counsel), for respondent Elena Kirkorian.

Norman Volk Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael I. Joseph of counsel), for respondents Kruger Leasing, Inc., and Philip T. Carpenter.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion of the defendant Elena Kirkorian and that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Kruger Leasing, Inc., and Philip T. Carpenter which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) are denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a determination of the plaintiff's cross motion.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345). In opposition, the plaintiff, who has a herniated disc, submitted, among other things, an affirmation of his orthopedist which specified the decreased range of motion in his lumbar and cervical spines, and explained that his injuries are permanent and causally related to the motor vehicle accident. The orthopedist's opinion, supported by objective evidence, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., supra; Jacobowitz v. Roventini, 302 A.D.2d 432).

Because the Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury, it denied as academic the plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and for discovery sanctions. In light of the foregoing, we remit the matter for determination of the plaintiff's cross motion.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fabiano v. Kirkorian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

denying a defense motion for summary judgment where "the plaintiff, who has a herniated disc, submitted, among other things, an affirmation of his orthopedist which specified the decreased range of motion in his lumbar and cervical spines, and explained that his injuries are permanent and causally related to the motor vehicle accident. The orthopedist's opinion, supported by objective evidence, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact."

Summary of this case from Moscato v. United States

denying a defense motion for summary judgment where "the plaintiff, who has a herniated disc, submitted, among other things, an affirmation of his orthopedist which specified the decreased range of motion in his lumbar and cervical spines, and explained that his injuries are permanent and causally related to the motor vehicle accident. The orthopedist's opinion, supported by objective evidence, was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact."

Summary of this case from Martin v. Beight
Case details for

Fabiano v. Kirkorian

Case Details

Full title:GIOVANNI FABIANO, appellant, v. ELENA KIRKORIAN, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 288

Citing Cases

Hawkins-Williams v. Perez

The defendant has submitted the medical reports of Drs. Robert Israel and Stephen W. Lastig who opined that…

YEON OK PI v. MINERVA CONFESSOR

Dr. Chang stated that he had measured the plaintiffs' range of motion through various tests that confirmed…