From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F. J. K. v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jul 15, 2010
No. 13-09-00174-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00174-CV

Opinion delivered and filed July 15, 2010.

On appeal from the 365th District Court of Maverick County, Texas.

Before Justices YAÑEZ, RODRIGUEZ, and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion to reverse and vacate judgment. By their motion, the parties ask the Court to: (1) reverse and vacate the trial court's judgment; (2) dismiss the appeal; (3) tax costs against the party incurring same; and (4) release the appellants' surety, Hudson Insurance Company, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bond filed by appellants.

The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court's opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we vacate the trial court's judgment, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties' settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d).

Rule 42.1(a)(2) permits the Court to render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements or to vacate the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; we cannot do both. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), (B). The parties have asked us to dismiss the appeal. We cannot both vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d), (f).

The parties request that the Court release the appellants' surety, Hudson Insurance Company, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bond filed by appellants. The request is GRANTED. We hereby release the appellants' surety, Hudson Insurance Company, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bond filed by appellants.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).


Summaries of

F. J. K. v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jul 15, 2010
No. 13-09-00174-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)
Case details for

F. J. K. v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:F. J. K. ENTERPRISES, LTD. CO., EXPRESS CARRIERS, L.P., EXPRESS CARRIERS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

No. 13-09-00174-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)