Opinion
5:22-cv-76
07-11-2022
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING CASE (Doc. 6)
GEOFFREY W. CRAWFORD, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
On May 5,2022, self-represented Plaintiff Gregory Ifesinachi Ezeani was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915; however, Plaintiff's Complaint was dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 6), which the court now considers.
Dismissal is warranted for substantially the same reasons as explained in the May 5 Order. (See Doc. 4 at 3-5.) Although Plaintiff now seeks $10,000,000 in damages, the Amended Complaint does not state a Bivens claim against Defendant. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S.Ct. 1843, 1857 (2017) Because Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged a claim for relief, his Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. The court hereby certifies that under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) any appeal would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED.