From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eyraud v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2022
No. 27375-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

27375-21S

03-14-2022

Joseph C. Eyraud & Bridget M. Eyraud Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On January 27, 2022, the parties filed a proposed stipulated decision for the Court's consideration. Upon review of the record, however, it appears that petitioners may have fully paid the tax liability for the 2018 tax year prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. If so, the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for their 2018 tax year is invalid and this Court lacks jurisdiction of this case. See Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527 (1985).

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before March 31, 2022, the parties shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. We will hold the parties' proposed stipulated decision pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue in this case.


Summaries of

Eyraud v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2022
No. 27375-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Eyraud v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Joseph C. Eyraud & Bridget M. Eyraud Petitioners v. Commissioner of…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

No. 27375-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)