From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EXSON v. ROAL

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 10-2640 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-2640 (RHK/AJB).

August 2, 2010


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated June 30, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction;

3. Petitioner's "Motion in Support of Issuance of Supoena [sic] Duces Tecum," (Doc. No. 4), is DENIED; and

4. Petitioner's "Motion for Emergency Hearing for Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

EXSON v. ROAL

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 10-2640 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)
Case details for

EXSON v. ROAL

Case Details

Full title:JEROLD EDWARD EXSON, Petitioner, v. WENDY J. ROAL, d.b.a. Warden…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 2, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-2640 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)