Opinion
No. 68569
09-11-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original writ petition challenges a district court order vacating a court-annexed arbitration award in a tort action. Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the district court's order was an arbitrary or capricious abuse of discretion or made in excess of its jurisdiction, and thus our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 New 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (holding that this court has the discretion whether to consider a writ petition). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge
Boyack Orme & Taylor
Law Office of Corey B. Beck, P.C.
Eighth District Court Clerk