From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Tucker

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Apr 15, 2015
NO. WR-83,023-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. WR-83,023-01

04-15-2015

EX PARTE RANDY WAYNE TUCKER, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR13-410A IN THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT FROM COOKE COUNTY

Per curiam . ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. The trial court shall determine whether Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant timely informed counsel that he wanted an appeal, and if so, what actions counsel took to facilitate that appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: April 15, 2015
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Tucker

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Apr 15, 2015
NO. WR-83,023-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Ex parte Tucker

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE RANDY WAYNE TUCKER, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

NO. WR-83,023-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 15, 2015)