From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Tillery

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 18, 2009
Nos. WR-72,927-01 WR-72,927-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 18, 2009)

Opinion

Nos. WR-72,927-01 WR-72,927-02

Filed: November 18, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus, Cause Nos. 20,157 20,158, appeal from the 258th District Court, Polk County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robbery and burglary of a habitation and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment for each cause. Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely inform him of his right to appeal. He also alleges that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Applicant's history of mental illness for a possible insanity defense. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant's counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall make findings on whether counsel investigated Applicant's prior mental health history or had him evaluated for a possible insanity defense. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Tillery

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 18, 2009
Nos. WR-72,927-01 WR-72,927-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Ex Parte Tillery

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE BARRETT MICHAEL TILLERY, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 18, 2009

Citations

Nos. WR-72,927-01 WR-72,927-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 18, 2009)