From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte State of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 3, 1989
555 So. 2d 195 (Ala. 1989)

Opinion

87-1048.

March 3, 1989.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals (8 Div. 740).

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Bryce U. Graham, Tuscumbia, for respondent.


WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, ALMON, ADAMS and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

SHORES, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., dissent.


There were four blacks on the venire. The State had eleven strikes. The State struck three of the four blacks. It struck a black with its fifth, sixth, and tenth strikes. The State provided race-neutral reasons for each of these strikes. I question whether a prima facie case of racially discriminatory peremptory striking was made so as to shift the burden to the State to prove race-neutral reasons for each of its strikes of black jurors, see Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); but, clearly, if it was made, then the State met the requirements of Batson in explaining its reason for each strike. Ex parte Shelton, 521 So.2d 1038 (Ala. 1988).

I would reverse and remand.

SHORES and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte State of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama
Mar 3, 1989
555 So. 2d 195 (Ala. 1989)
Case details for

Ex Parte State of Alabama

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte State of Alabama. (Re Jay Cee VAN SCOY v. STATE)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Mar 3, 1989

Citations

555 So. 2d 195 (Ala. 1989)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Jackson

7) (Houston, J., dissenting); see also Ex parte Weaver, 682 So.2d 493 (Ala. 1996) (Houston, J., dissenting);…

Ex Parte Thomas

I believe that the peremptory challenge has served the litigants in this state (black, white, male, female,…