From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Shropshire

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 13, 2017
NO. WR-81,739-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)

Opinion

NO. WR-81,739-04

09-13-2017

EX PARTE REBEKAH RACHELL SHROPSHIRE, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 07-10-10 ,763-D IN THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DE WITT COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to seventy-five years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant complains that counsel did not request an instruction as to self-defense. She contends that counsel failed to object to State argument that was outside the record. She complains that counsel failed to object to testimony that impermissibly commented on her exercising her right to silence after her arrest. She contends that counsel failed to designate a witness as an expert in knives.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: September 13, 2017
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Shropshire

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 13, 2017
NO. WR-81,739-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Ex parte Shropshire

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE REBEKAH RACHELL SHROPSHIRE, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 13, 2017

Citations

NO. WR-81,739-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)