From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Saucedo

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 26, 2019
NO. WR-87,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

NO. WR-87,190-02

06-26-2019

EX PARTE ANDREW MELCHOR SAUCEDO, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1415436-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

HERVEY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which Keasler, J., joined. CONCURRING OPINION

I wholeheartedly agree with Judge Keasler that Mable has proven itself poorly reasoned over time and that it should be overruled. I also agree with the new analytical framework that he proposes. I write separately, however, to point out that the moral of this long-running story is that defense attorneys and prosecutors should not allow a defendant to plead guilty until the laboratory report comes back. Defense attorneys might be subject to ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, and the State might have to re-prosecute defendants.

With these comments, I join Judge Keasler's concurring opinion and concur in the judgment of the Court. Filed: June 26, 2019 Publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Saucedo

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 26, 2019
NO. WR-87,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Ex parte Saucedo

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ANDREW MELCHOR SAUCEDO, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

NO. WR-87,190-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 26, 2019)