From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Sanders

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 5, 2007
No. WR-68,723-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-68,723-01

Filed: December 5, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from Lubbock County, Cause No. 2002-401108 In the 364th District Court. On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of deadly conduct and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sanders v. State, No. 07-04-00481-CR (Tex.App.-Amarillo, delivered April 24, 2006, pet. ref'd). Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he did not object on confrontation grounds when the State elicited a statement Quincy Bell made to the police. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Sanders

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 5, 2007
No. WR-68,723-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Sanders

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE LAMAR SANDERS, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 5, 2007

Citations

No. WR-68,723-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2007)