From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Saenz

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 22, 2012
NO. WR-58,536-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

NO. WR-58,536-03

02-22-2012

EX PARTE EDMUNDO VASQUEZ SAENZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0136890-HL IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his judgment and sentence are void because the trial court did not assess a fine. The trial court concluded that Applicant's sentence is void and recommended that we grant his writ of habeas corpus. We believe that the record is not sufficient to resolve Applicant's claim.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make further findings of fact as to whether the factual basis of Applicant's claims was ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence on or before the date the -01 application was filed in Dallas County. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 4(c). The trial court shall make any other findings of fact that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Saenz

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 22, 2012
NO. WR-58,536-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Ex parte Saenz

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE EDMUNDO VASQUEZ SAENZ, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

NO. WR-58,536-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 22, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Saenz

In 2002, relator was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to…