From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Romines

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 30, 2003
884 So. 2d 879 (Ala. 2003)

Opinion

1022065.

December 30, 2003.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals (Barbour Circuit Court, CV-99-13; L. Bernard Smithart, Judge; Court of Civil Appeals, 2020278).

J. Chris Cochran of Pittman, Hooks, Dutton, Kirby Hellums, P.C., Birmingham; and Jimmy S. Carlton, Sr., Eufaula, for petitioner.

Lisa D. Van Wagner and Bart Harmon of Webb Eley, P.C., Montgomery, for respondent.


WRIT DENIED.

SEE, LYONS, BROWN, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

JOHNSTONE, J., dissents.


I respectfully dissent from the denial of the petition for the writ of certiorari. Ted Romines's mental predisposition to the on-the-job-injury, hypertension in this case, does not except his hypertension, a physical injury, from the definition of "injury" in the Workers' Compensation Act.

"`Preexisting diseases or other predisposition does not prevent compensability. The employer takes the worker as he finds him. It is not necessary that the employment conditions be the sole cause, or dominant cause, so long as they are a contributing cause.'"

Ex parte Valdez, 636 So.2d 401, 405 (Ala. 1994) (quoting Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation § 41.64(c) (1991)).

That hypertension can be a physical injury is evident from the majority opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, Eldeco, Inc. v. Romines, 884 So.2d 867 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003). Footnote 4 of that majority opinion states:

"`Hypertension' is defined as `[h]igh blood pressure.' Stedman's Medical Dictionary 855 (27th ed. 2000). The terms `hypertension' and `high blood pressure' are used interchangeably throughout this opinion."

Romines, 884 So.2d at 873 n. 4. That majority opinion observes:

"During his testimony, Dr. Oakley read the following excerpt from his letter to the insurer:

"`"[Romines's] hypertension . . . is labile and severe enough that it affects his health physically. [Romines's] anxiety is severe enough that it creates a physical problem — reference his hypertension and chest pain.

"`" Mr. Romines's primary disabling diagnosis is his anxiety complicated by depression. This exacerbates his hypertension and causes chest pain. This renders him unable to function and in my opinion, this is a permanent disability."'"

Romines, 884 So.2d at 873 (some emphasis original; some emphasis added; footnote 4 omitted). That majority opinion also discloses the mechanism of Romines's injury:

"Dr. Oakley also stated that Romines's `stress at work caused him to have the problems that [he] was experiencing,' and that, although the stress did not cause the high blood pressure, it did cause `the high blood pressure to be much more difficult to control.' Dr. Oakley concluded that the stress Romines experienced on the job caused him to be disabled from performing his job."

Romines, 884 So.2d at 873.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Romines

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 30, 2003
884 So. 2d 879 (Ala. 2003)
Case details for

Ex Parte Romines

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Ted ROMINES. (In re Eldeco, Inc. v. Ted Romines)

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Dec 30, 2003

Citations

884 So. 2d 879 (Ala. 2003)

Citing Cases

Muhammad v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

In light of our standard of review, and in light of the Supreme Court's admonition that medical causation…