From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Rodriguez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 25, 2012
NOS. WR-14,689-09 & 10 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

NOS. WR-14,689-09 & 10

01-25-2012

EX PARTE MIGUEL SALAS RODRIGUEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2001-029 & 2001-030 IN THE 274th DISTRICT COURT

FROM CALDWELL COUNTY


Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of murder (count one), possession of a controlled substance (count two), and aggravated assault. Punishment for all of the offenses was enhanced by prior convictions. The jury assessed punishment at life in prison for each offense. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Rodriguez v. State, Nos. 0302-00240 & 00241-CR (Tex. App.-Austin, delivered March 27, 2003).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to request a jury instruction on the issue of self-defense.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Rodriguez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 25, 2012
NOS. WR-14,689-09 & 10 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Ex parte Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE MIGUEL SALAS RODRIGUEZ, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

NOS. WR-14,689-09 & 10 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 25, 2012)