From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 8, 1985
480 So. 2d 1229 (Ala. 1985)

Opinion

84-1280.

November 8, 1985.

Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals; 480 So.2d 1226.

J. Donald Reynolds, Montgomery, for petitioner.

Arthur F. Fite, III of Merrill, Porch, Doster Dillon, Anniston, for respondent.


By denying the petition, we do not intend to be understood as agreeing that administrative agencies are restricted by the Administrative Procedure Act, §§ 41-22-1, et seq., Code 1975, to legal rules of evidence. The Act itself provides:

"[T]he rules of evidence as applied in nonjury civil cases in the circuit courts of this state shall be followed. When necessary to ascertain facts not reasonably susceptible of proof under those rules, evidence not admissible thereunder may be admitted (except where precluded by statute) if it is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent persons in the conduct of their affairs."

§§ 41-22-13, Code 1975.

We agree, however, with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, 480 So.2d 1226.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 8, 1985
480 So. 2d 1229 (Ala. 1985)
Case details for

Ex Parte Regional Dialysis of Anniston

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte REGIONAL DIALYSIS OF ANNISTON. (Re REGIONAL DIALYSIS OF ANNISTON…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 8, 1985

Citations

480 So. 2d 1229 (Ala. 1985)

Citing Cases

Sylacauga Health Care Center, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning Agency

' " Nursing Home of Dothan, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning Development Agency, 542 So.2d 935…