From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Morris

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 28, 2011
No. WR-76,419-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

NO. WR-76,419-01

09-28-2011

EX PARTE LEE EDWARD MORRIS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 22425 IN THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM LAMAR COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment on one count and seventy-five years' imprisonment on the other count. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Morris v. State, No. 06-09-00147-CR (Tex. App.-Texarkana April 23, 2010).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by, inter alia, failing to object to the court reporter's failure to transcribe the entire voir dire, failing to challenge jurors who knew the prosecuting attorney, and failing to argue that the State's reasons given for striking two jurors were not actually race-neutral, but were mere pretext to conceal discrimination.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant's trial counsel regarding Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Morris

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 28, 2011
No. WR-76,419-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Ex parte Morris

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE LEE EDWARD MORRIS, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. WR-76,419-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 28, 2011)