From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Kruppenbacher

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 28, 2022
No. 05-22-00904-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00904-CR

10-28-2022

EX PARTE MICHAEL KRUPPENBACHER


On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WX22-92138-U

ORDER

AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE

Before the Court is appellant's October 24, 2022 motion for an extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant's brief filed by November 8, 2022. The State's brief shall be due by November 29, 2022.

After reviewing the clerk's record filed on October 18, 2022, the Court questions its jurisdiction over the appeal. In an appeal from a habeas matter, the Court's jurisdiction is triggered by the filing of a notice of appeal within thirty days after the trial court enters an appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

The clerk's record reflects the district court referred appellant's habeas application to a magistrate for hearing. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 54.306(a)(8); see also Ex parte Edwards, No. 05-03-00556-CR, 2003 WL 21962575, at *3 (Tex. App.-Dallas Aug. 18, 2003, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (holding that under proper referral from trial court, Dallas County magistrates may hear habeas applications challenging extraditions). After hearing the matter, the magistrate denied relief and prepared proposed findings and recommendations. The record does not show the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations were considered or adopted by the district court. There is no other written order in the record that could serve as the basis for an appeal. Thus, the Court questions whether a proposed set of findings and recommendations from the magistrate constitutes an appealable order sufficient to invoke the Court's jurisdiction.

Additionally, the record does not contain a certification of the right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

To expedite the resolution of this extradition appeal, the Court ORDERS the parties to address the issue of the Court's jurisdiction in their briefs.

We further ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of the right to appeal for this case and file it as a supplemental record within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order to the Honorable Stephanie Huff, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; the

Honorable Anthony Randall, Dallas County Magistrate Judge, Auxiliary Court No. 2; and to counsel for the parties.


Summaries of

Ex parte Kruppenbacher

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 28, 2022
No. 05-22-00904-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Ex parte Kruppenbacher

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE MICHAEL KRUPPENBACHER

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 28, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00904-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2022)