From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 7, 1923
96 So. 722 (Ala. 1923)

Opinion

7 Div. 403.

June 7, 1923.

Isbell Scott, of Ft. Payne, for petitioner.

See brief in Jones v. State, 207 Ala. 179, 93 So. 293.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.

No brief reached the Reporter.


Petition for certiorari by Bob Jones to review the judgment of affirmance entered by the Court of Appeals on the appeal styled Jones v. State, 96 So. 721. The only question meriting consideration here is whether the unanimous decision of this court in Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 179, 93 So. 293, should be retracted. For the conclusive reasons and upon the sound authorities therein set forth and noted, no rational doubt, under the Constitution and laws of Alabama, of the correctness of the decision in the Banks Case, supra, exists; and, hence, upon the authority of Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 179, 93 So. 293, this court denies the petition for the writ.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 7, 1923
96 So. 722 (Ala. 1923)
Case details for

Ex Parte Jones

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte JONES. JONES v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 7, 1923

Citations

96 So. 722 (Ala. 1923)
209 Ala. 566

Citing Cases

Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield

Lange, Simpson Brantly and W. P. Rutledge, all of Birmingham, and Huey, Welch Stone, of Bessemer, for…