From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Howard

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 5, 1963
155 So. 2d 927 (Ala. 1963)

Opinion

3 Div. 74.

September 5, 1963.

Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The original opinion in this cause is withdrawn and this one is substituted therefor on rehearing.

Petitioner Howard was convicted of murder in the first degree and we affirmed, Howard v. State, 273 Ala. 544, 142 So.2d 685. He then filed an application for leave to file a petition for a writ of error coram nobis in the Circuit Court of Butler County.

Originally, we denied Howard's application for leave to file petition for writ of error coram nobis. However, the State, not Howard, filed the application for rehearing in this cause and now appears to take the position that the petition should be granted. Since both parties to this controversy now apparently request that the petition be granted, we accede to the requests.

Petition for leave to file petition for writ of error coram nobis in the Circuit Court of Butler County granted.

Rehearing granted and petition granted.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Howard

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 5, 1963
155 So. 2d 927 (Ala. 1963)
Case details for

Ex Parte Howard

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Roosevelt HOWARD

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Sep 5, 1963

Citations

155 So. 2d 927 (Ala. 1963)
155 So. 2d 927

Citing Cases

Howard v. State

The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed that conviction September 28, 1961. Howard v. State, 273 Ala. 544, 142…

Howard v. State

This is the second appeal in this case. Appellant appealed the death sentence in his first trial and we…