From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 28, 2006
No. WR-64,873-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. WR-64,873-01

June 28, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. CR-2223-00-F, in the 332nd District Court, Hidalgo County.


ORDER


This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus that was transmitted to this Court pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of the offense of delivery of cocaine, and punishment was assessed at confinement for ten years. No direct appeal was taken. Applicant contends that his sentence is illegal and that he is not the same person that was convicted. The trial court entered an order designating issues on May 16, 2006. On May 24, 2006, this Court received the application, but the designated issues have not yet been resolved. We believe that the application was prematurely forwarded to this Court. Therefore, it is this Court's opinion that additional facts need to be developed and because this Court cannot hear evidence, the trial court is the appropriate forum. The trial court shall resolve those issues as set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3 (d), in that it may order affidavits, depositions, or interrogatories, or it may order a hearing. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, the court shall first decide whether Applicant is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent and Applicant desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall then, pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04, appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Following receipt of additional information, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant is serving an illegal sentence and whether or not he is the person who was convicted of this offense. The trial court shall also make any further findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of the application for writ of habeas corpus. Because this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriquez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), these applications for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issues shall be accomplished by the trial court within 90 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance should be provided to this Court.

Any extensions of this time period shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 28, 2006
No. WR-64,873-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Ex Parte Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE FRANCISCO LOPEZ HERNANDEZ, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 28, 2006

Citations

No. WR-64,873-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 28, 2006)