From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Heaney

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 13, 2017
NO. WR-28,330-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)

Opinion

NO. WR-28,330-04

09-13-2017

EX PARTE PATRICK HEANEY, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-14-205206-A IN THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal. Heaney v. State, No. 03-15-00470-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 7, 2015) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because the State did not dismiss other charges for lack of evidence. Applicant alleges that his understanding of the plea agreement was that the other charges would be dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim that the State did not comply with the terms of the plea agreement. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant's guilty plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make specific findings addressing Applicant's claim that he understood that the State would dismiss contemporaneous charges for lack of evidence. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: September 13, 2017
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Heaney

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Sep 13, 2017
NO. WR-28,330-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Ex parte Heaney

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE PATRICK HEANEY, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 13, 2017

Citations

NO. WR-28,330-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2017)