From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Harris

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 3, 2016
NO. WR-48,554-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NO. WR-48,554-03

02-03-2016

EX PARTE JAMES DANIEL HARRIS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 49178-C1 IN THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WICHITA COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Harris v. State, No. 02-12-00091-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 10, 2014) (not designated for publication).

In thirteen grounds, Applicant alleges that his trial and/or appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance and that the trial court erred in failing to appoint new trial counsel. There is no response from counsel or findings from the trial court.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to Applicant's claims for habeas corpus relief. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claims.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: February 3, 2016
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Harris

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 3, 2016
NO. WR-48,554-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Ex parte Harris

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JAMES DANIEL HARRIS, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

NO. WR-48,554-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 3, 2016)