From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Francisco-Sanchez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 9, 2018
NO. WR-88,316-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 9, 2018)

Opinion

NO. WR-88,316-01

05-09-2018

EX PARTE NOHEL FRANCISCO-SANCHEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W14-59703-J(A) IN THE NUMBER THREE DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Francisco-Sanchez v. State, No. 05-16-00012-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 28, 2016) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because his counsel failed to pass along a thirty-five year plea offer from the State. Applicant alleges that, had he known of this offer, he would have accepted it and not entered an open plea of guilty and gone to the trial court for punishment.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: May 9, 2018
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Francisco-Sanchez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 9, 2018
NO. WR-88,316-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Ex parte Francisco-Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE NOHEL FRANCISCO-SANCHEZ, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 9, 2018

Citations

NO. WR-88,316-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 9, 2018)