Opinion
NO. WR-65,799-03
09-12-2011
EX PARTE CLEVE FOSTER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN CAUSE NO. C-1-007519-0839040 FROM THE
CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
PRICE , J., filed a dissenting statement in which WOMACK, J., joined.
DISSENTING STATEMENT
Since this Court dismissed the applicant's first subsequent post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.071 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,the United States Supreme Court has stayed and then unstayed his execution twice, based upon claims that he should be able to proceed on the merits of a subsequent state writ application because his court-appointed initial state habeas counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to raise and develop a manifestly colorable claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After it lifted the second stay of the applicant's execution, however, the Supreme Court granted certiorari review in Martinez v. Ryan, and stayed another Texas execution, in Balentine v. Texas, in order to address (Martinez) and (presumably) preserve (Balentine) issues that are essentially identical to that which the applicant raised in his first subsequent writ application back in December, and now raises in this, his second subsequent application. I do not know whether the Supreme Court might once again stay the applicant's execution in light of Martinez and Balentine, but I do not think that this Court ought to tolerate allowing any execution of the applicant to proceed without knowing how the Supreme Court will ultimately dispose of the issues raised in those cases. For reasons already expressed in my dissenting statements in Ex parte Foster, and Ex parte Balentine, and because this Court refuses even to grant the applicant's motion for stay of execution pending the Supreme Court's disposition of Martinez and Balentine, I am once again compelled to dissent. DO NOT PUBLISH
TEX CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.071. Ex parte Foster, 2010 WL 5600129 (Tex. Crim. App., No. WR-65,799-02, delivered Dec. 30, 2010) (not designated for publication).
Foster v. Texas, 131 S.Ct. 991 (2011); Foster v. Texas, 131 S.Ct. 1034 (2011); Foster v. Texas, 131 S.Ct. 1848 (2011); Foster v. Texas, 131 S.Ct. 2951 (2011).
131 S.Ct. 2960 (2011).
131 S.Ct. 3017 (2011).
2010 WL 5600129, WR-65,799-02 (Tex. Crim. App. delivered Dec. 30, 2010) (not designated for publication) (Dissenting Statement of Price, J., joined by Holcomb, J.).
WR-54,071-03 (Tex. Crim. App. delivered June 14, 2011) (not designated for publication) (Dissenting Statement of Price, J., joined by Johnson & Alcala, JJ.).
--------