From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Braun

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 16, 2018
NO. WR-88,349-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 16, 2018)

Opinion

NO. WR-88,349-01 NO. WR-88,349-02

05-16-2018

EX PARTE JEREMY CHAD BRAUN, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 69,062-B & 69,063-B IN THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm and possession with intent to deliver controlled substances in a drug free zone. He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment in the firearm possession case and seventy years' imprisonment in the controlled substance case. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Braun v. State, Nos. 07-15-00351-CR & 07-15-00352-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 11, 2017) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant's appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he has a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: May 16, 2018
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Braun

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 16, 2018
NO. WR-88,349-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Ex parte Braun

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE JEREMY CHAD BRAUN, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

NO. WR-88,349-01 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 16, 2018)