From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Braden

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 30, 2006
No. WR-65,373-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. WR-65,373-01

Delivered: August 30, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 344856 in the 262nd, District Court from Harris County.


ORDER


This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. Applicant was convicted of murder and punishment was assessed at confinement for forty years. There was no appeal from this conviction. Applicant contends that he has not received credit for time he was confined pursuant to parole violator warrants in this cause. The trial court has entered findings of fact that affidavits from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Criminal Institutions and Parole Divisions are true. However, Applicant has presented documentation that authorities in Seminole County, Florida, placed a parole violator hold on Applicant before the date the Parole Division indicates a parole violator warrant was executed in 2002, and did not remove another hold for several weeks after a warrant was withdrawn in 2000. The trial court has not addressed the accuracy of Applicant's proffered documents. It is this Court's opinion that additional facts need to be developed, and since this Court cannot hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum. The trial court may resolve those issues as set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d), TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC., in that it may request documentation from authorities in Seminole County, Florida, as to when a hold was placed and then lifted in 2000 or 2001 for the parole violator warrant in this cause, or it may order a hearing. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing the court shall first decide whether Applicant is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent, and Applicant desires representation by counsel, the trial court shall then appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing pursuant to the provisions of Article 26.04, TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC. Following the receipt of additional information the trial court shall make additional findings of fact as to what dates that Applicant was confined by Florida authorities pursuant to parole violator warrants in this cause. This application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issues shall be accomplished by the trial court within 60 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing any affidavits, exhibits, or transcription of the court reporter's notes from any evidentiary hearing, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 90 days of the date of this order.

In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance shall be provided to this Court.

Any extensions of this time period shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Braden

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Aug 30, 2006
No. WR-65,373-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Ex Parte Braden

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ROBERT EDMON BRADEN, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2006

Citations

No. WR-65,373-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 30, 2006)