From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewing v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 27, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-287 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-287 CRIM. NO. 2:93-CR-00101

04-27-2016

JAMES L. EWING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.



MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAVERS OPINION AND ORDER

On April 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Motion to Vacate (ECF No. 88) be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition, and that Petitioner's Motion Pursuant to Fed . R. Crim. P. 60(b)(1) and (6) (ECF No. 89), be denied. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 90) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Motion to Vacate (ECF No. 88) is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition, and Petitioner's Motion Pursuant to Fed . R. Crim. P. 60(b)(1) and (6) (ECF No. 89), is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ George C . Smith

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Ewing v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 27, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-287 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Ewing v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. EWING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 27, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-287 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)