From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewing v. K2 Prop. Dev., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2017
CASE NO. 16cv678-LAB (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 16cv678-LAB (AGS)

12-06-2017

ANTON EWING, Plaintiff, v. K2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and DANIEL KLEIN, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Courts have discretion to grant motions to withdraw. Light Salt Investments, LP v. Fisher, 2013 WL 12121255, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2013). David Socher has good reasons to withdraw: his client hasn't paid him for a year and fired him two months ago. Leatt Corp. v. Innovative Safety Tech., LLC, 2010 WL 444708, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010). Socher's motion to withdraw is granted.

Daniel Klein can represent himself pro se, but a legal entity like K2 Property can't proceed in court without an attorney. D-Beam Ltd. P'ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 974 (9th Cir. 2004). K2 Property must obtain a new attorney by December 28, 2017. If K2 Property fails to obtain counsel, it will face default judgment. Employee Painters' v. Ethan Enterprises, 480 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 2007).

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 6, 2017

/s/_________

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ewing v. K2 Prop. Dev., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2017
CASE NO. 16cv678-LAB (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Ewing v. K2 Prop. Dev., LLC

Case Details

Full title:ANTON EWING, Plaintiff, v. K2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and DANIEL KLEIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 16cv678-LAB (AGS) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2017)