From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewbank v. Emrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 15, 2018
Case No. 6:17-cv-00187-MK (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 6:17-cv-00187-MK

10-15-2018

ROBERT DRAKE EWBANK, Plaintiff, v. JEFF EMRICK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo filed a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 78, and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and adopt the Findings and Recommendations.

Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 78, is ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Amend, ECF No. 75 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of October, 2018.

/s/ Michael McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ewbank v. Emrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Oct 15, 2018
Case No. 6:17-cv-00187-MK (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Ewbank v. Emrick

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DRAKE EWBANK, Plaintiff, v. JEFF EMRICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

Case No. 6:17-cv-00187-MK (D. Or. Oct. 15, 2018)