From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewadi v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 6, 2014
117 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-6

Nzingha EWADI, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Respondents, Camila Lopez, Defendant.

Sim & Record, LLP, Bayside (Sang J. Sim of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan P. Greenberg of counsel), for respondents.



Sim & Record, LLP, Bayside (Sang J. Sim of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan P. Greenberg of counsel), for respondents.
GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, SWEENY, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered August 19, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the municipal defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against the City of New York and Fire Department of the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff testified at his deposition that the only words spoken to her by firefighters arriving to extinguish the fire at the building in which she was trapped were, “Hold on.” These words are too vague to manifest an assumption by firefighters of a voluntary duty to plaintiff beyond that owed to the general public ( see Coleson v. City of New York, 106 A.D.3d 474, 474–475, 964 N.Y.S.2d 419 [1st Dept.2013] ). The balance of plaintiff's assertions are insufficient to raise an issue that the fire department assumed direction and control in the face of a “known[ ] blatant” danger, and affirmatively placed plaintiff in harm's way ( see Abraham v. City of New York, 39 A.D.3d 21, 28, 828 N.Y.S.2d 502 [2d Dept.2007],lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 707, 859 N.Y.S.2d 392, 889 N.E.2d 79 [2008];see also e.g. Garrett v. Holiday Inns, 58 N.Y.2d 253, 262, 460 N.Y.S.2d 774, 447 N.E.2d 717 [1983] ).

Plaintiff's argument that misfeasance does not require a special relationship to create a duty is unavailing ( Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc., 21 N.Y.3d 420, 426 n. 1, 972 N.Y.S.2d 169, 995 N.E.2d 131 [2013] ).


Summaries of

Ewadi v. City of N.Y.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 6, 2014
117 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ewadi v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Nzingha EWADI, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 439
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3199

Citing Cases

Morel v. City of New York

The City met its prima facie burden of establishing that no special relationship existed which would give…

Lomtevas v. City of New York

Instead, PAPD personnel 'overheard' NYPD radio traffic describing DL as he headed to the bridge, when they…