From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 15, 1980
379 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

Nos. OO-336, OO-337.

February 15, 1980.

Appeal from the Gadsden County Circuit Court, Richard Hood, J.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender; Steven H. Parton, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.


Delinquency petitions were filed charging E.W., a juvenile, with a burglary, the theft of a calculator, and the theft of a bicycle. We find the challenge to the disposition of the first two charges to be without merit, but we reverse as to the theft of the bicycle.

The evidence established that a bicycle was missing and that the juvenile owner named in the amended petition and his mother identified a bicycle which had been recovered by the police. The evidence also established that E.W. returned home one evening with a bicycle which his mother testified was not his. There was, however, no evidence whatsoever establishing that the specific bicycle found in E.W.'s possession was the bicycle identified by the other boy and his mother. Thus, we agree with appellant's contention that the judge should have granted the motion for judgment of acquittal as to the theft of the bicycle.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

E.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 15, 1980
379 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

E.W. v. State

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF E.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 15, 1980

Citations

379 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

S.P.L. v. State

The absence of evidence to connect identified property with property found in the defendant's possession has…

Nelson v. State

In the case sub judice, no evidence indicated that the articles of clothing found in appellant's possession…