From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everett v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1924
121 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)

Opinion

(Filed 26 March, 1924.)

APPEAL by defendants from Cranmer, J., at February Term, 1923, of ROBESON.

McLean, Varser, McLean Stacy for plaintiff.

McKinnon, Fuller McKinnon for defendants.


Civil action, indebitatus assumpsit, tried upon the following issue:

"In what amount, if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $393 and interest."

Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors.


A careful perusal of the present record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Everett v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1924
121 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)
Case details for

Everett v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:F. G. EVERETT v. R. M. WILLIAMS AND THE WILLIAMS COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1924

Citations

121 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1924)
121 S.E. 927