Everett v. State

Full title: Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 25, 2017

208 So. 3d 833 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D15–1219

01-25-2017

Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker–Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay E. Silver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker–Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay E. Silver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State , 569 So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla. 1990) ("Lay witness opinion is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience. ... We find the officers' testimony within the permissible range of lay observation and ordinary police experience.")