From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Roman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9291 9292N Index 22765/14E

05-09-2019

Crystal EVANS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Dr. Henry ROMAN, M.D., Defendant, Noakita Allen, R.N., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant. Drabkin & Margulies, New York (Robert W. Margulies of counsel), for Noakita Allen, R.N., Split Rock Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, LLC, and Split Rock Multi–Care Center, LLC, respondents. Egan Law Firm, New York (Susan B. Egan of counsel), for RLD Medical Services, P.C., respondent.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellant.

Drabkin & Margulies, New York (Robert W. Margulies of counsel), for Noakita Allen, R.N., Split Rock Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, LLC, and Split Rock Multi–Care Center, LLC, respondents.

Egan Law Firm, New York (Susan B. Egan of counsel), for RLD Medical Services, P.C., respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George J. Silver, J.), entered April 11, 2018, which granted defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to provide cell phone records and produce her cell phone for inspection by defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and defendants' motion denied. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 21, 2018, which, in effect, granted plaintiff's motion for reargument and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The court should not have directed plaintiff to produce her phone and all of the material stored on it because defendants failed to meet the threshold for disclosure by showing that their request for plaintiff's cell phone was reasonably calculated to yield information material and necessary to its defense (see Forman v. Henkin, 30 N.Y.3d 656, 664–665, 70 N.Y.S.3d 157, 93 N.E.3d 882 [2018] ; AllianceBernstein L.P. v. Atha, 100 A.D.3d 499, 954 N.Y.S.2d 44 [1st Dept. 2012] ).


Summaries of

Evans v. Roman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2019
172 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Evans v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:Crystal Evans, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Henry Roman, M.D., Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 9, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
100 N.Y.S.3d 26
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3693

Citing Cases

Tousant v. Aragona

Indeed, "[i]f there is any possibility that the information is sought in good faith for possible use as…

Spoljaric v. Savarese

As more fully set forth on the record, the court denied defendant Savarese's request to dismiss the complaint…