From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Potter

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Feb 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:08-CV-1687-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:08-CV-1687-TWT.

February 27, 2009


ORDER


This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] of the Magistrate Judge recommending granting in part and denying in part the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 4]. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the grounds of insufficient service of process is DENIED. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages is GRANTED. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to judicial estoppel is DENIED. The Defendant has failed to show that the Plaintiff clearly acted with the intent to deceive the Bankruptcy Court at the time she filed her Chapter 13 petition and thereafter. No discharge of her debts was ordered. Therefore, this is not an appropriate case for judicial estoppel. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Evans v. Potter

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Feb 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:08-CV-1687-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Evans v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:ERSELA J. EVANS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER Postmaster General, United…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Feb 27, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:08-CV-1687-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stuart v. Resurgens Risk Mgmt., Inc.

See Robinson, 595 F.3d at 1275 ("[F]ailure to timely amend a Chapter 13 reorganization plan to reflect a…

Gelinas v. U.S. Bank, NA

However, "dismissal of [a p]laintiff's bankruptcy case alone, without any showing that the bankruptcy court…