From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Oktibbeha Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV247-SA-SAA (N.D. Miss. Jul. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV247-SA-SAA

07-29-2013

ELIZABETH R. EVANS PLAINTIFF v. OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, GLENN HAMILTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CIRCUIT CLERK OF OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MARVEL HOWARD, DANIEL JACKSON, JOHN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO K. TRAINER, and JOE WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANTS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendants Oktibbeha County, Glenn Hamilton, Marvel Howard, Daniel Jackson, John Montgomery, Orlando Trainer, and Joe Williams jointly filed a Motion to Dismiss [4] for lack of personal jurisdiction due to insufficient process and insufficient service of process. After reviewing the motion, response, rules and authorities, the Court makes the following findings:

Plaintiff Elizabeth Evans filed this suit against Defendants on July 5, 2012. Hamilton is the circuit clerk of Oktibbeha County; Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, and Williams serve on the Board of Supervisors of Oktibbeha County ("Board"); and Trainer is the president of the Board. On November 5, 2012, exactly 123 days after the suit was filed, Evans served summonses on Defendants in this manner: (1) on Oktibbeha County by stating service upon Hamilton as the county's agent, but actually delivering summons to the County Administrator Don Posey; (2) on Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, Williams, and Trainer by delivering summonses again to Don Posey; and (3) on Hamilton no service was or has been made to this date.

The fact that Evans did not serve summonses within the 120 day statutory deadline of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is alone sufficient grounds to dismiss this case as to Oktibbeha County and all of the members of the Board in their individual and official capacities. The dismissal of this case, however, is further warranted by a plethora of defects in service. The service of summons on Oktibbeha County fails also because it was not made on the statutorily designated agent. Service upon a county in Mississippi shall be made by "delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the president or clerk of the board of supervisors." Miss. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(6). Neither Posey nor Hamilton are the president or clerk of the Board.

Next, the service of summons on each of the members of the Board being delivered to Posey is insufficient. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) and Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(1), Evans could have completed service of process upon each member of the Board either by personal delivery to each member or his agent or by leaving a copy at each individual's place of abode with a suitable adult.

Therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [4] is GRANTED and this case as to:

1. Oktibbeha County is DISMISSED for untimely and constitutionally insufficient service of process;
2. Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, Trainer, and Williams is DISMISSED with respect to both their individual and official capacities for untimely and constitutionally insufficient service of process; and
3. Hamilton is DISMISSED for failure to serve process.
This case is hereby DISMISSED.

Sharion Aycock

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Evans v. Oktibbeha Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Jul 29, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV247-SA-SAA (N.D. Miss. Jul. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Evans v. Oktibbeha Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH R. EVANS PLAINTIFF v. OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, GLENN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 29, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV247-SA-SAA (N.D. Miss. Jul. 29, 2013)