From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Absolute Results

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 14, 2021
21 Civ. 280 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 280 (LGS)

07-14-2021

DALLAS X. EVANS, Plaintiff, v. ABSOLUTE RESULTS, Defendant.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in lieu of an answer (Dkt. No. 16).

WHEREAS, pursuant to Individual Rule III.A.3, a pre-motion conference is not required prior to filing a motion to dismiss in lieu of an answer. Pursuant to Individual Rule III.C.2, a movant must still file a pre-motion letter prior to filing such a motion. That letter must include the information required by Individual Rule III.A.1 as well as a proposed briefing schedule. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to renewal once the parties have filed pre-motion letters per the Individual Rules.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (1) close the docket entry at number 16 and (2) mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Evans v. Absolute Results

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 14, 2021
21 Civ. 280 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Evans v. Absolute Results

Case Details

Full title:DALLAS X. EVANS, Plaintiff, v. ABSOLUTE RESULTS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 280 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)