From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ethridge v. Childs

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 3, 2013
1:10-cv-01962-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)

Opinion


CARL ETHRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. S. CHILDS, et al., Defendants. No. 1:10-cv-01962-LJO-MJS (PC) United States District Court, E.D. California. July 3, 2013

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (1) FINDING COGNIZABLE CLAIM; (2) FINDING SERVICE OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND (3) FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (ECF. No. 18)

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carl Ethridge is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed October 20, 2010 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

On June 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff should proceed on the Second Amended Complaint Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim seeking damages against Defendants Hernandez and Childs; all other claims and Defendant CDCR Secretary should be dismissed with prejudice; and service should be initiated on Defendants Hernandez and Childs. (ECF No. 18.) The fourteen day deadline to file objection to the findings and recommendations was June 21, 2013, and Plaintiff did not object or otherwise respond to the findings and recommendations.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the findings and recommendations filed on June 3, 2013 (ECF No. 18) in full;

2. Plaintiff shall proceed on the Second Amended Complaint Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim seeking damages against Defendants Hernandez and Childs;

3. All other claims asserted in the Second Amended Complaint and Defendant CDCR Secretary are dismissed with prejudice;

4. Service shall be initiated on the following Defendants:

A. HERNANDEZ, Associate Warden, California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility - Corcoran State Prison;

S. CHILDS, Correctional Lieutenant, California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility - Corcoran State Prison;

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2) summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the Second Amended Complaint filed May 2, 2013;

6. Within thirty (30) days from service of this order Plaintiff shall complete and return to the Court the Notice of Submission of Documents along with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each Defendant listed above;

and

c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed Second Amended Complaint filed May 2, 2013; and

7. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court shall direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ethridge v. Childs

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 3, 2013
1:10-cv-01962-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Ethridge v. Childs

Case Details

Full title:CARL ETHRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. S. CHILDS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

1:10-cv-01962-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2013)