From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etemad v. Underwood Perkins Law Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-0669-B (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-0669-B

05-01-2014

BEJAN DAVID ETEMAD, Plaintiff, v. UNDERWOOD PERKINS LAW OFFICE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Etemad v. Underwood Perkins Law Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 1, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-0669-B (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Etemad v. Underwood Perkins Law Office

Case Details

Full title:BEJAN DAVID ETEMAD, Plaintiff, v. UNDERWOOD PERKINS LAW OFFICE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2014

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-0669-B (N.D. Tex. May. 1, 2014)

Citing Cases

McDowell v. Our Lady of Lake

Indeed, Plaintiff has alleged that the conspiracy was in retaliation for what appears to have been his…