From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
954 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D07-329.

March 7, 2007. Order Denying Rehearing and Clarifying Conflict May 16, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-18790 CF10A.

Gonzalo Estrada, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. See Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing but grant his motion to certify conflict. As our affirmance was based in part on Spera v. State, 923 So.2d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), as we did in Spera, we certify conflict with Keevis v. State, 908 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

STONE, POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Estrada v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
954 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Estrada v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gonzalo ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

954 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Estrada v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Estrada v. State, 954 So.2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), in which the Fourth…