From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Tuck v. CF Real Estate Servs.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
21-CV-920 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-920 JLS (BLM)

07-16-2021

THE ESTATE OF JEAN ELLYN TUCK, and THE ESTATE OF ROBERT JAMES TUCK Plaintiff, v. CF REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge

On May 27, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Estate of Jean Ellyn Tuck and Estate of Robert James Tuck's Complaint without prejudice for improper venue. ECF No. 3. The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint within forty-five (45) days that sets forth a basis for venue in the Southern District of California. Id. at 4. The Court warned that “[s]hould Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint within the time provided, the Court will enter a final order dismissing this civil action with prejudice.” Id. (citing Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005)). However, the Court stated that “[s]uch dismissal would be without prejudice to Plaintiffs refiling their claims in the proper venue.” Id.

Plaintiffs have failed to file an amended complaint by the July 12, 2021, deadline. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the action. This dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiffs refiling their claims in the proper venue. The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Estate of Tuck v. CF Real Estate Servs.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
21-CV-920 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Estate of Tuck v. CF Real Estate Servs.

Case Details

Full title:THE ESTATE OF JEAN ELLYN TUCK, and THE ESTATE OF ROBERT JAMES TUCK…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

21-CV-920 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)