Opinion
CA 19-02063 CA 19-02296 CA 19-02297 CA 19-02298
09-22-2020
ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 4.)
PRESENT:
Appellant having moved to modify orders of this Court entered January 13, 2020, and June 26, 2020, on the appeals taken herein from orders and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), and December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), having moved for relief pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a), and having moved for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motions are denied.
Entered: September 22, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court