From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Seiler

Supreme Court of California
Mar 5, 1917
174 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1917)

Opinion

S. F. No. 8189.

March 5, 1917.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, admitting a will to probate. J.V. Coffey, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A.G. Kazebeer, and J.E. Pemberton, for Appellant.

Cullinan Hickey, Wilson Haines, and Hugh K. McKevitt, for Respondents.


This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order admitting a will to probate on the ground that the appeal was not taken within the time allowed by law. It was not taken within sixty days after the date of the entry of the order (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1715), but it was taken within thirty days after a motion for a new trial duly made was determined. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939)

The court is of the opinion that the provision of section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 205), providing that if proceedings on motion for a new trial are pending, the time for appeal from the judgment shall not expire until thirty days after entry in the trial court of the order determining the motion for a new trial, or other termination in the trial court of the proceedings upon such motion, is applicable in the matter of an appeal from an order admitting a will to probate, and for that reason the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.


Summaries of

Estate of Seiler

Supreme Court of California
Mar 5, 1917
174 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1917)
Case details for

Estate of Seiler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of PAUL SEILER, Deceased

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 5, 1917

Citations

174 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1917)
164 P. 401

Citing Cases

Estate of Day

Despite this very explicit language requiring the prosecution of an appeal within sixty days after entry of…