From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Randolfi v. Ultissima Beauty Instt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1992
182 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 27, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

After the plaintiff obtained a default judgment against the defendant, the Sheriff of Nassau County levied an execution upon property in which the defendant had an interest. This property had been specifically designated by the plaintiff in the execution prepared by its attorney. Subsequently, the default judgment was vacated on the ground that personal jurisdiction had never been obtained over the defendant. Upon the cross motion of the Sheriff of Nassau County, the plaintiff was directed to pay poundage fees. Under the circumstances of this case, this was correct (CPLR 8012 [b] [2]; see, Viggiano v Viggiano, 136 A.D.2d 630; West Side Natl. Bank v Warsaw Discount Bank, 204 App. Div. 4; Matter of Associated Food Stores v Farmers Bazaar, 126 Misc.2d 541). Eiber, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Estate of Randolfi v. Ultissima Beauty Instt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1992
182 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Estate of Randolfi v. Ultissima Beauty Instt

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF FRANK RANDOLFI, Appellant, v. ULTISSIMA BEAUTY INSTITUTE, LTD.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

TAUB v. TOKAYER

In any event, his claim should also be held in abeyance pending determination of Rothner's motion to vacate…